30 November 2008

My Sexy Confusion





Just take a look at these three buxom babes. 'The thinking-man's pin-ups' as my colleague called them. Julianne Moore, Laura Linney and Jodie Foster.
The problem stems from an initial confusion. Watching Love Actually, I was more than convinced in my perception that it was Jodie Foster in the American role and protested this to the bitter end in light of the fact that I'd seen her in Hannibal the night before. It transpired that it could be confirmed without hesitation that Jodie Foster was in Silence of the Lambs playing Clarice Starling so this would imply irrefutably that she revived the same role for the sequel, Hannibal. On inspection, this turned out to be the more libidinous Julianne Moore, who at this juncture I was sure I'd seen in Hannibal just the night before, bringing in to question my certainty of Jodie Foster's role as Clarice Starling. With Jodie Foster occupying the role of Clarice Starling this would logically give Julianne Moore the Love Actually role. Apparently not. That was Laura Linney, who was in neither Hannibal, nor Silence of The Lambs. I know this because I've now seen Hannibal, Silence of The Lambs and Love Actually within a week and can just about tell the difference between these three sumptious beauties. Here they are;
Julianne Moore is hotter, sexier, obviously kinkier and more fun to listen to and look at.
Jodie Foster is a better actress and probably person since she probably wouldn't be into devil worship and sexual torture unlike Moore.
Laura Linney is the not as sexy as Julianne Moore or as good an actress as Jodie Foster but she never got hit on by Anthony Hopkins so I probably still have a chance.

1 comment:

M said...

Wow, i never thought of them that way. Never realized they actually look quite similar. Maybe its the lighting in your pictures, but maybe it really is true... Tobias, your skillful attention to detail astounds me. :o)

Blog Archive